<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CheckBoxList outputs a table by default</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.neatlysliced.com/2008/12/checkboxlist-outputs-a-table-by-default/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.neatlysliced.com/2008/12/checkboxlist-outputs-a-table-by-default/</link>
	<description>Bread was overrated.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:12:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://blog.neatlysliced.com/2008/12/checkboxlist-outputs-a-table-by-default/comment-page-1/#comment-10535</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.neatlysliced.com/?p=250#comment-10535</guid>
		<description>I usually keep server controls at bay with a ten foot pole where I can, which is doable in ColdFusion, since a ColdFusion post still returns the HTML controls along with the CF controls.

However, if you want to access an ASP.NET input of any type in codebehind, you &lt;em&gt;must&lt;/em&gt; have them be server controls, which is eternally frustrating since so many ASP.NET controls output gobbleygook HTML. Sigh.

So, yes, I&#039;m with you - anything to make the control less nasty is going to be entered into a blog entry from now on. I&#039;m tired of dealing with gobbleygook, and I&#039;m tired of creating site that rely on jQuery for ajax posts. I want to have a server-side post fallback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually keep server controls at bay with a ten foot pole where I can, which is doable in ColdFusion, since a ColdFusion post still returns the HTML controls along with the CF controls.</p>
<p>However, if you want to access an ASP.NET input of any type in codebehind, you <em>must</em> have them be server controls, which is eternally frustrating since so many ASP.NET controls output gobbleygook HTML. Sigh.</p>
<p>So, yes, I&#8217;m with you &#8211; anything to make the control less nasty is going to be entered into a blog entry from now on. I&#8217;m tired of dealing with gobbleygook, and I&#8217;m tired of creating site that rely on jQuery for ajax posts. I want to have a server-side post fallback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony White</title>
		<link>http://blog.neatlysliced.com/2008/12/checkboxlist-outputs-a-table-by-default/comment-page-1/#comment-10534</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.neatlysliced.com/?p=250#comment-10534</guid>
		<description>Cool tip.  I remember when working with coldfusion, there were various controls to handle select dropdowns, as well as other form elements, and looking back, I wish I had exercised more customization to get them to output the way I really wanted.

Then again, I&#039;m a lot more particular now than I was then.

If I ever start using ASP.NET, tips like these would be bookmarked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool tip.  I remember when working with coldfusion, there were various controls to handle select dropdowns, as well as other form elements, and looking back, I wish I had exercised more customization to get them to output the way I really wanted.</p>
<p>Then again, I&#8217;m a lot more particular now than I was then.</p>
<p>If I ever start using ASP.NET, tips like these would be bookmarked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

